Legal cases of interest..... |
|||||
|
|||||
Right To Privacy At Issue For City Residents By Sarah M. Feingold, Daily Record Reporter March 9, 2006 The constitutional right to privacy for citizens of the City of Rochester was at issue in several recent court decisions. First, on July 27, 2005 New York State Supreme Court, Monroe County Judge Thomas A. Stander vacated a search warrant against the home of Larry Weekes, and issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Neighborhood Empowerment Team (NET) office from seeking "administrative" search warrants against the member's home. In a second case, in a Nov. 29, 2005 decision Rochester City Court Judge Ellen M. Yacknin denied an application from the outgoing director of NET for an "administrative" search warrant against the home of Steven Kelly. Judge Yacknin ruled that there was no application pending for any permit or other city approval regarding the home. Under Rochester's Municipal Code, such an application is a prerequisite to a warrant application. Lastly, On Dec. 22, 2005 Rochester City Court Judge Melchor E. Castro denied a motion by Rochester's Corporation Counsel to imprison Walter and Florine Nelson. The Nelsons, a couple in their 60s had declined to open their door to allow a search of their home under what they believed to be an illegal search warrant. Judge Castro determined the Nelsons' polite refusal to open their door did not impede the officers and the Nelsons could not be held in contempt based on the officers' commendable choice not to break the door. Neither Weekes, Kelly, or the Nelsons were suspected of any crime. Instead, the city argued that it may obtain search warrants to inspect city homes for code violations without showing any evidence, or even suspicion, that any violation existed. The properties in the Weekes, Kelly and Nelson cases were all owned by members of the New York State Coalition of Property Owners and Business, Inc. (Coalition). The Coalition claims since 2002, the NET office has obtained 46 search warrants, which the Coalition maintained were illegal and unconstitutional. "These cases are not about the Fourth Amendment. They are about the authority of municipalities in New York to enact local laws," said David Ahl, a board member of the Coalition. "Since 2001, the Legislature has considered at least five separate bills that would have amended the General Municipal Law to allow local officials to obtain 'administrative' search warrants. All five bills died in committee. The Legislature has clearly spoken on this issue, and it is not the place of Rochester's City Council or its appointed officials to do what the Legislature has forbidden." Editor's note: All of te above cases were initiated and concluded under the City's prior administration (Johnson) and in no way represents or involves anyone in the current administration (Duffy). |
|||||